Supply Chain News / Risk & Compliance / Ports

Federal Hearing Held to to Address Impacts of Labor Dispute in Portland

June 25, 2012
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

On the afternoon of Friday, June 22, 2012, U.S. District Judge Michael Simon held a hearing related to the recent slowdowns and disruptions at Terminal 6 – Oregon’s only international container shipping terminal. An ongoing labor dispute has significantly reduced productivity and caused costly delays at the facility, which is managed under a 25-year lease with ICTSI Oregon.

Two unions claim jurisdiction for the same jobs at the container facility. Approximately two full-time jobs are at the heart of the matter, involving the plugging, unplugging and monitoring of refrigerated containers.

The federal judge on Friday appointed former Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski to help settle a dispute between the two unions that has slowed the flow of cargo at the Port of Portland.

U.S. District Judge Michael Simon said the slowdown staged by longshore workers has caused economic harm to the region and the suffering will only get worse without a quick resolution. He ordered lawyers to meet with Kulongoski starting this morning.

Simon made the surprise announcement late Friday afternoon, at the end of a 3 1/2-hour hearing in which the National Labor Relations Board asked for a temporary restraining order that would require workers to speed things up or risk a contempt of court charge.

The judge did not act on the request, and it remains to be seen when operations will return to normal.

The jobs in question have been performed at Terminal 6 since the early 1970s under a collective bargaining agreement between the Port and its employees, who are members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Another union, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), is now claiming jurisdiction for these jobs and demanding that ICTSI Oregon, the Port’s lessee at Terminal 6, hire them to perform the work.

Amanda Gamblin, a lawyer for the company that operates Terminal 6, told the judge that the gates could close next week if normal operations don't resume.

The economic damage from the slowdown has not been tallied, but more than 1,000 regional businesses depend on the container terminal to get their goods to or from international markets. When ships are diverted and cargo must be rerouted, that adds costs to shippers and potentially devastating delays to companies importing or exporting perishable or seasonal items.

Portland's Terminal 6 is by far the smallest of the six container-shipping ports on the West Coast. It's at a disadvantage compared with the other Pacific ports because it's more than 100 miles from the mouth of the Columbia River, and ships need pilots to bring them to port.

Port managers are concerned that the shippers bypassing Portland might decide they can live without the port.

But now that a private company is in control, the longshoremen say the jobs must switch to them because of the collective bargaining agreement between the ILWU and the Pacific Maritime Association that covers all West Coast ports. It states that longshoremen maintain the reefers.

"It's possible that the ICTSI sold the same rock to different buyers," the judge said.

To help solve the dilemma, the judge turned to Kulongoski, a former labor lawyer who served as governor from 2003 to 2011. He has the power to order the sides to meet face-to-face and engage in serious negotiations. A status conference has been scheduled for June 29 if no deal has been reached by then.

Kulongoski will be paid $350 an hour, with the costs split between ICTSI, the unions and the Port of Portland.

"The longer this dispute takes to resolve, the worse it will be for everyone," the judge said.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

KC SmartPort Momentum

Kansas City SmartPort Momentum 2013 focused on 3PLs, the issues facing the industry, and the role or logistics in economic development

Podcasts

Assurance of Supply: A Top Concern for Manufacturers

Every manufacturer has an assurance of supply problem to some extent due to the complexity of global sourcing. For years, manufacturers were blessed with high margins but margins have grown paper thin. You can’t fill up your distribution centers with excess inventory – not only is there a cost factor but the pace of business and consumer buying trends causes goods to quickly turn obsolete. Assurance of supply provides the speed and agility that is essential to being able to compete in today’s market.

 

Speaker info: Diane Palmquist, VP Manufacturing Industry Solutions

                                         

More Podcasts

World Trade 100 Magazine

wt september 2014

2014 September

Check out the September 2014 edition of World Trade WT100, featuring the 2014 Logistics Directory, plus much more!
Table Of Contents Subscribe

Transportation Capacity

As peak season has gotten underway, what is your experience with transportation capacity?
View Results Poll Archive

WT100 STORE

world-class-warehousing.gif
World-Class Warehousing and Material Handling, 1st Edition

Filled with proven operational solutions, it will guide managers as they develop a warehouse master plan, one designed to minimize the effects of supply chain inefficiencies as it improves logistics accuracy and inventory management - and reduces overall warehousing expense.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Use our interactive maps to locate service providers across North America.Interactive Map

Logistics Development Partners 

IWLA Members

STAY CONNECTED